What is the association of depression with clinical response to therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs?

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory joint disease that is associated with higher prevalence of depression. There is limited literature about the impact of depression, particularly regarding the response to therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with PsA patients that started their first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) was conducted. In the majority of cases, a cutoff score of ≥ 8 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to define cases of depression. In cases where patients did not complete the questionnaire, a previous diagnosis made by a psychiatrist was used to establish the presence of depression. Response to therapy 12 months after the start of bDMARD was evaluated and the switch rate to another bDMARD due to inefficacy was assessed at month 12. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (66 females, 51.2%; mean age of 47.7 ± 11.0 years and mean disease duration of 10.0 ± 7.7 years) with PsA were included. Thirty-two (24.8%) patients had depression. Patients with depression and peripheral involvement had a significantly lower ACR20/50/70 responses (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001 respectively) after 12 months of therapy and a significantly worse EULAR response (p = 0.002). Furthermore, patients with depression and axial involvement had a significantly worse response based on ASDAS response criteria (p = 0.031). Switch due to ineffectiveness in the first 12 months was significantly higher in patients with depression (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Depression in PsA is a frequent yet often understudied comorbidity. The causal relationship between depression and PsA is difficult to decrypt and further research is needed. Recognition of depressive symptoms is crucial and a multidisciplinary approach should be provided to individuals with this comorbidity. Key Points • Depression in PsA is a frequent yet often understudied comorbidity. In our study, the prevalence of depression was 24.8%. • Depression in PsA seems to be associated to lower response to therapy and higher discontinuation rates of bDMARD. • Recognition of depressive symptoms is crucial and a multidisciplinary approach should be provided to individuals with this comorbidity.

Pseudotumoral calcinosis of the spine in systemic sclerosis - an atypical location.

Pseudotumoral calcinosis, particularly around the spine, is a rare complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The authors report a case of a 60-year-old woman with a limited cutaneous SSc observed for a 4-month history of back pain. Physical examination revealed a left paravertebral mass measuring around 7cm in the longest axis. The computed tomography (CT) showed the presence of calcified mass in the left paravertebral muscle, extending from the 12th dorsal to the 3rd lumbar vertebra. A diagnosis of pseudotumoral calcinosis secondary to SSc was made. Symptomatic treatment with analgesics allowed a significant improvement of clinical symptoms. Subcutaneous calcinosis is a common complication of SSc, however the pseudotumoral form remains extremely rare, particularly around the dorsolumbar spine. Treatment is limited to analgesic therapy or, in more severe cases, to surgical excision. Follow-up should be conducted to rule out complications.

Remission and low disease activity matrix tools: results in real-world rheumatoid arthritis patients under anti-TNF therapy.

BACKGROUND: Remission/ low disease activity (LDA) are the main treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Two tools showing the ability to predict golimumab treatment outcomes in patients with RA were published. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the real-world accuracy of two quantitative tools created to predict RA remission and low disease activity. METHODS: Multicenter, observational study, using data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt), including biologic naïve RA patients who started an anti-TNF as first-line biologic and with at least 6 months of follow-up. The accuracy of two matrices tools was assessed by likelihood-ratios (LR), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: 674 RA patients under first-line anti-TNF (266 etanercept, 186 infliximab, 131 adalimumab, 85 golimumab, 6 certolizumab pegol) were included. The median (IQR) age was 53.4 (44.7-61.1) years and the median disease duration was 7.7 (3.7-14.6) years. The majority were female (72%). Most patients were RF and/or ACPA positive (75.5%) and had erosive disease (54.9%); 58.6% had comorbidities. At 6-months, 157 (23.3%) patients achieved remission (DAS28 ESR < 2.6) and 269 (39.9%) LDA (DAS28 ESR ≤ 3.2). Area under the curve for remission in this real-world sample was 0.756 [IC 95% (0.713-0.799)] and for LDA was 0.724 [IC 95% (0.686 -0.763)]. The highest LR (8.23) for remission state was obtained at a cut-off ≥ 67%, with high specificity (SP) (99.6%) but low sensitivity (SN) (3.2%). A better balance of SN and SP (65.6% and 73.9%, respectively) was observed for a cut-off >30%, with a LR of 2.51, PPV of 43.3% and NPV of 87.6%. CONCLUSION: In this population, the accuracy of the prediction tool was good for remission and LDA. Our results corroborate the idea that these matrix tools could be helpful to select patients for anti-TNF therapy.

Real-world Longterm Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register.

OBJECTIVE: To assess longterm effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, exposed to at least 1 TNFi, prospectively followed between 2001 and 2017. METHODS: Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for first-, second-, and third-line TNFi. Responses included European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), minimal disease activity (MDA), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at 3 and 6 months. Baseline predictors of discontinuation and response were studied using Cox and multivariable multinomial/logistic regression models. RESULTS: The 750 patients with PsA showed drug retention of 4.1 ± 3.4 years (followup 5.8 ± 3.8 yrs) for first TNFi. Switching to a second (189 patients) or third (50 patients) TNFi further decreased survival by 1.1 years. Female sex, higher baseline 28-joint count Disease Activity Score, and infliximab were predictors of first TNFi discontinuation. After 6 months of the first TNFi, 48.7% of patients achieved a good EULAR criteria response and 20.9% were in DAPSA remission. There were 11.4% in MDA, and 56.4% had a good ASDAS. Responses to the second TNFi were significantly inferior compared to responses to the first TNFi. Female sex and higher baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index were negatively associated with good EULAR response at 3 months, and obesity decreased the chance of response at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this study, switching to a second or third TNFi was associated with significantly lower drug survival and response rates for patients with axial and peripheral PsA subtypes. More successful therapeutic approaches will require considering the effect of sex and obesity on TNFi effectiveness.

The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars - 2017 update.

Biosimilars are new and more affordable similar versions of previously approved reference biological drugs. Following the approval of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar in 2013, the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology issued a position paper on the use of biosimilars in rheumatic conditions covering efficacy, safety, extrapolation, interchangeability, substitution and pharmacovigilance. However, as this is a rapidly evolving field, it was felt that the knowledge and evidence gathered since then justified an update of these statements. Literature searches on these issues were performed and the search results were presented and discussed in a national meeting. Portuguese rheumatologists considered that affordability should be taken into consideration when initiating a biological drug, but other factors were equally important. In patients already on reference biological treatment, switch to a more affordable biosimilar is desirable, provided a set of conditions is rigorously met. Automatic substitution is not acceptable and current evidence is insufficient to support interchangeability. Extrapolation of clinical indications is endorsed by Portuguese rheumatologists, and the statements on safety, pharmacovigilance and traceability are in accordance with the previous position paper.

Efficacy and Safety of Vaccination in Pediatric Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Children and adolescents with systemic rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of infections. Although some infections are vaccine-preventable, immunization among patients with juvenile rheumatic diseases is suboptimal, partly due to some doubts that still persist regarding its efficacy and safety in this patient population. OBJECTIVES: To review the available evidence regarding the immunological response and the safety of vaccination in children and adolescents with systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (SIRD). METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature until December 2014 using MEDLINE, EMBASE and abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism congresses (2011-2014), complemented by hand search was performed. Eligible studies were identified and efficacy (seroprotection and/or seroconversion) and safety (reactions to vaccine and relapse of rheumatic disease) outcomes were extracted and summarized according to the type of vaccine. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles concerning vaccination in pediatric patients with SIRDs were found, that included almost 2100 children and adolescents, comprising nearly all standard vaccinations of the recommended immunization schedule. Children with SIRDs generally achieved seroprotection and seroconversion; nevertheless, the antibody levels were often lower when compared with healthy children. Glucocorticoids and conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs do not seem to significantly hamper the immune responses, whereas TNF inhibitors may reduce antibody production, particularly in response to pneumococcal conjugate, influenza, meningococcal C and hepatitis A vaccine. There were no serious adverse events, nor evidence of a relevant worsening of the underlying rheumatic disease. Concerning live attenuated vaccines, the evidence is scarce, but no episodes of overt disease were reported, even in patients under biological therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Existing literature demonstrates that vaccines are generally well tolerated and effective in stable SIRD patients, yet antibody titers are frequently lower than in healthy controls. There is some evidence that biological therapy could hamper the immune response. Data on safety of live attenuated vaccines is limited. Although the available literature covers most vaccines included in the national immunization plan, there is a need for more information regarding new vaccines and new anti-rheumatic therapies.